Highly unregulated, the sale of toxic nicotine concoctions for e-cigarette refills pose a serious threat to children.
EMS brings in a two-year-old with vomiting and decreased mental status. According to their report, he had been doing well until he suddenly got sick en route to the hospital. He became sleepier, and, as they wheeled him in, he began to seize. His parents say he was at a relative’s house when he was found drinking from a container of some colorful liquid, which he accidently spilled on himself. Then he began to vomit. The culprit: the liquid was used to refill electronic cigarettes.
Background
Electronic cigarettes — also known as e-cigarettes or just e-cigs — are the tobacco industry’s hot new commodity. E-cigs are battery-powered devices that heat a liquid solution of nicotine, or e-liquid. Users inhale the vapors that result from heating the solution, which is known as “vaping.” The devices also have been used with other solutions, some containing cannabis. E-cigarettes were first developed in China and quickly became very popular throughout Asia and Europe. They are marketed as a “safer” cigarette that can help cigarettes users to quit smoking.
Until recently, the Food and Drug Administration did not regulate e-cigarettes, although for several years it has had the authority to regulate tobacco products. However, under proposed regulations issued in April, the FDA would have the authority to restrict sales of e-cigarettes to anyone under 18, require manufacturers to validate claims regarding their safety and mandate warning labels. The new regulation, however, would not restrict advertising or ban flavoring the nicotine. The proposed rules are now in a public comment period.
Health Concerns
The devices themselves are generally well-made and rarely leak. Health concerns, then, often stem from the fact that many of these devices contain refillable nicotine-containing cartridges. Exposure to the nicotine solutions is dangerous because they are highly concentrated. The concentration of nicotine in these solutions can range up to 100 mg/ml. The lethal dose of nicotine is uncertain, with estimates of 30-60 mg in an adult and 10 mg in a child (Durmowicz, 2014), while some estimate the dose to be closer to 1 mg/kg (Garcia 1977). An oral LD50 of 6.5–13 mg/kg has been reported in dog models (Mayer, 2014).
Based on this LD50, the ingestion of only a few milliliters of some of the preparations is toxic. This is particularly troublesome as the solution can be bought a gallon at a time and stored in containers without safety mechanisms. Unknowingly, parents may also leave these containers anywhere around the house, in areas easy for toddlers to reach.
Liquid nicotine is readily absorbed through the skin, a risk not found with other tobacco products that require ingestion or inhalation. Lack of childproof containers, along with colorful packaging and flavorings, makes them prime targets for exploratory toddlers.
In its early clinical phase, acute nicotine poisoning is characterized by nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, salivation, bronchorrhea, tachypnea, hypertension, tachycardia, miosis, tremor, fasciculations, and seizures. The delayed phase consists of respiratory depression, dyspnea, bradycardia, hypotension, shock, mydriasis, weakness, muscle paralysis, and coma (Metz et al., 2004). Treatment is symptom directed and includes benzodiazepines for seizures, intubation for airway and respiratory support, and atropine for bronchorrhea and bradycardia.
The CDC reports that the percentage of U.S. middle and high school students who use e-cigs more than doubled between 2011 and 2012, from 4.7% to 10%. In 2012, more than 1.78 million middle and high school students nationwide had tried e-cigarettes.
This is not surprising given the appealing packaging and flavoring that manufacturers use to make it more palatable. US Poison Centers have seen a surge in calls too, averaging 200 calls a day in early 2014 (Chatham-Stephens MMWR 2014 data). Half of those calls were for exposures in children under the age of five.
Because e-cigs do not expose the users or those around them to tar products and other products of pyrolysis they are more socially acceptable than regular cigarettes. This allows smokers to use them in places where smoking is prohibited. However, users are still exposed to nicotine so there are legitimate concerns regarding their safety. In addition to adverse effects due to its stimulant properties, vaporized nicotine may be carcinogenic, just like other forms of tobacco. Little is known about the impact of exposure to liquid nicotine from e-cigs on public health, but there is concern that this will be a gateway to use of other drugs.
Furthermore, the nicotine is dissolved in a solution containing multiple other chemicals. Although the concentration of these is very low, we still don’t have much information about the potential toxicity of these additional agents in the e-liquid. The proposed rules would require manufacturers to divulge what chemicals are included in the liquid solutions.
Liquid nicotine exposures are becoming more common. While serious exposures are uncommon and no deaths have been reported from unintentional exposures to e-liquids, there is still the potential for dangerous toxicity and close surveillance is warranted.
The concentration of nicotine in these solutions can range up to 100 mg/ml. The lethal dose of nicotine is uncertain, with estimates of 30-60 mg in an adult and 10 mg in a child, while some estimate the dose to be closer to 1 mg/kg. An oral LD50 of 6.5–13 mg/kg has been reported in dog models. Based on this LD50, the ingestion of only a few milliliters of some nicotine preparations is toxic. The high concentrations are particularly troublesome as the solution can be bought a gallon at a time and stored in containers without safety mechanisms.
Case Conclusion
After receiving a benzodiazepine for the seizure and a thorough scrubbing to remove any remaining liquid nicotine, your two-year-old patient slowly wakes up. He is admitted overnight for observation, and by the next morning, he is eating and playing and discharged home.
REFERENCES
- Durmowicz EL (2014) The impact of electronic cigarettes on the pediatric population. Tob Control, 23, Supple 2:ii41-ii46.
- Gacria-Estrada H, et al. (1977) An unusual case of nicotine poisoning. Clin Toxicol,10,391-393.
- Mayer B. (2014). How much nicotine kills a human? Tracing back the generally accepted lethal dose to dubious self-experiments in the nineteenth century. Archives of Toxicology, 88, 5–7.
- Metz C.N., Gregersen P.K., & Malhotra A.K. (2004). Metabolism and biochemical effects of nicotine for primary care providers. The Medical Clinics of North America, 88, 1399–1413
- Chatham-Stephens K, et al. (2014) Notes from the field: calls to poison centers for exposures to electronic cigarettes-United States, September 2010-February 2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep,63(13):292-293.
10 Comments
Could it not be argued that the Governments Quit program strategies have indeed encouraged smokers to resort to nicotine profducts (in all their various forms) as Nicotine Replacement Therapy – what is therapeutic about this poison?!!
It is ridiculous to suggest that taking nicotine will get smokers off nicotine – why not read Allen Carrs book ‘The Nicotine Conspiracy’ written in 2006 to understand the role of those involved in the promotion of this poison.
its still cool tho
is the effects of nicotine less in e-cigs than normal cigarettes? Is it still a risk of heart and lung disease?
Electronic cigarette and liquid cartridge manufacturers, which include some traditional tobacco companies, state that they are looking for new, potentially safer ways, to allow adults to use nicotine and tobacco products where they otherwise face restrictions on smoking in public places.
Your article is sensationalised and misinforming
Nicotine in liquid or vapor is not classed as carcinogin
Nicotine is mixed with propolyne glycole or vegetable glycerine both concidered generally safe
Many More people have been poisoned from houshold products
The majority of people who smoke ecigs do not consider them to be a mode for quitting, but instead a compromise. Some OEM’s have made claims to the contrary, but those addicted to nicotine are in large part cognizant of the fact that this is false. With respect to your comment about other chemicals, this is the functional scenario:
1. Smoking cigarettes gives you lung cancer and has a well documented list of carcinogens–tar being one of many.
2. Ecigs contain fewer chemicals. Some of these may prove to also be carcinogens as well, but time will need to tell this.
Is quitting better? Absolutely. However, not all people are going to be able or possess the motivation and strength to quit. So smokers are faced with two doors. One door (conventional cigarettes) does everything but guarantee future health problems. OR Door two (Ecigs), which it may ultimately avoid the consequences associated with door 1, but there is a chance that the long term will show it is marginally or exponentially safer. The worst that can happen is that it ends up being just as bad as cigarettes.
E-cigarettes have many hidden risks of health. Regular use of these cigarettes causes lung cancer as a normal cigarette. So you should try to do less use of both cigarettes.
Unreal Smokers who are trying to give up try all sorts of nicotine replacements but the only ones that anyone says are any good are the products supplied by Government supported Quit organizations. I tried for years to give up the Smokes. I tried Nicotine Gum, Patches & was even put on an anti depressant drug that was supposed work every time none of it worked. Then I found Vape and have free of the Smokes for 2 years. It worked for me any many others. SO LAY OFF
Just like a Dr. To write such a contrite, misinformed article about something he knows nothing about. These doc’s are being urged by the FDA and American Cancer society and AHA to cry off E-cig benefits, for big tobacco has paid million in donations to these “Not for Profit” organizations in order to try to rid themselves of the thorn in their side that is vaping. The E-cig industry is a multi billion dollar industry this year (calculated at the end of 2015 by Wells Fargo look it up) and that is cutting directly into the bottom line of such wonderful companies as Altria and Phillip Morris. And we all know they have our best interest at heart wink wink.Dont believe everything you hear just because a doctor spews it out of his greedy, stubborn mouth. Look at the facts. The Royal College of Physicians have agreed that while much testing needs to be done to prove long term safety, that preliminary results show that E-cigs are 95% safer than traditional cigarettes. In the next ten years if big tobacco has its way, tobacco cigs will take A BILLION LIVES. Now as a Dr. under Hippocratic oath, shouldn’t you at least investigate the possibility that these devices could be a life saving innovation. Yes, regulations are necessary, and will in fact be good for child safety and changing some questionable marketing practices. But you were very quick to throw some numbers out there that were dead wrong Dr. Common E-cig liquid on the market is obtained in 3, 6, 9, and 12 mg per milliliter. The 100mg/ml concentration is for mixing and flavoring your own liquid and is something that is only done by very few with the knowledge and expertise to do so. Any who, good day Dr. And I hope to do some better research and make your own choice, not Mitch Zeller’s forcefully imposed choice
you can’t help but wonder about the people that put together this silly garbage. all the could be and may be and might be shows me how much these guys know about a subject. its ok to be against something but at least state the facts. the maybes and could be’s show that a person does NOT have their ducks in a row. If one is concerned about this, do your homework and get the truth from various sorces